The result of an unfavorable psychophysiological credibility evaluation throughout the police hiring course of, and even throughout inner investigations for current officers, doesn’t routinely disqualify a candidate or result in disciplinary motion. It’s typically thought of one piece of knowledge amongst many who contribute to a broader analysis. The importance of this knowledge level varies relying on departmental insurance policies and the context of the evaluation.
A destructive outcome can increase issues and immediate additional investigation. Regulation enforcement businesses usually use the evaluation as a device to determine potential areas of threat or dishonesty. Whereas the evaluation itself is just not admissible as proof in courtroom, the knowledge gleaned from the pre-test interview and post-test questioning can present leads for investigators to pursue by way of different strategies, reminiscent of background checks, interviews with references, and critiques of documentation. The outcomes might reveal inconsistencies or areas needing additional clarification.
